But the ride so far has been rather rocky, testing the patience of all stakeholders. So much so that the chair of the country’s largest lender, State Bank of India, had invoked divine intervention just three months ago, expressing his disappointment with the progress on bankruptcy cases — and their evident reflection in the masslender’s quarterly financial statements.
“Every morning I am looking at the sky and praying to God that the three large NCLT accounts stuck in the middle of resolution get resolved — these alone will give us more than Rs 16,000 crore in write-backs,” SBI chairman Rajnish Kumar had said in August, referring to Essar Steel, Bhushan Power and Steel and Alok Industries, where SBI has made 100% provisions against bad loans.
Kumar can now breathe a sigh of relief, with his bank getting more than Rs 12,000 crore in recoveries on the provisions.
“This much awaited judgement (on the primacy of lenders) also settles numerous points of law under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code — points that were tested in various courts,” Kumar said. “This should significantly reduce the scope for long-drawn litigations under IBC and would eventually lead to faster resolution of stressed assets.”
SECURED VS OPERATIONAL CREDITORS
Last Friday, in its 164-page verdict in the case of Essar Steel, the Supreme Court not only upheld that the ultimate discretion on distribution of funds lies with the Committee of Creditors (CoC), but also ratified that the rights of secured and unsecured financial creditors are different when it comes to payment claims on resolution proceeds.
“The Essar ruling is like the Kesavananda Bharati case, where the basic structure of the Constitution was defined,” said Hari Hara Mishra, director, UV Asset Reconstruction Company.
This ruling has also reinforced that the distribution of bid proceeds shall be in accordance with the provisions of the bankruptcy code and the resolution plan approved by majority of creditors, making it clear that equity holders have no right on claims.
“This has led to a narrowing down in the scope for interpretation and interference by the authorities,” said Ashish Pyasi, associate partner, Dhir and Dhir Associates. “This would also mean that now the commercial wisdom of committee of creditors will prevail and there is no equity as the interest of all stakeholders, including the operational creditors, has been taken care of in the amendment and the validity of same has also been tested by the Supreme Court in this ruling.”
TESTING OUR RESOLVE
For the bankruptcy mechanism, the journey over the past three years has been anything but smooth. It has faced obstacles from the word go. Not only were the biggest bad loan cases embroiled in litigation, but there have also been several issues about the interpretation of the law. Lenders were under constant fear that bankruptcy matters could get stuck in superior courts and then languish for months on delays caused by pendency and adjournments.
Since the IBC was first implemented in May 2016, the government has brought about several changes in the law, including giving powers to the Reserve Bank of India to send cases into bankruptcy, blocking errant promoters from bidding and allowing exits from the code with maximum CoC vote. History has shown that India has been rather poor in implementing laws such as SICA, BIFR, DRT or Sarfaesi, but the jinx seems to have been finally broken.
“This is a landmark judgment and it sets very positive precedence for banks that there is hope with IBC as a lot of assets undergoing resolution were solid assets with good recovery potential,” says CV Rajendran, MD, Catholic Syrian Bank.
Promoters of large bankrupt companies were steadfastly resisting loss of control over their business, and they also challenged the constitutional validity of the law. That contention was later shot down by the apex court, which held that the law does not infringe upon individual or fundamental rights.
But this does not mean the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code has failed to make a mark. Prior to IBC, no one would have imagined that the likes of Ruias, Dhoots, Singhals, Miglanis or Dhams would be ousted from companies that were symbolic to their very existence.
The Essar Steel judgement has come as a breather for 535 corporate debtors facing liquidation by December. The earlier rules allowed cases to be settled within 270 days, a deadline later relaxed to 330 days. Now, the apex court has held that if the debts are not resolved within this time frame, bankruptcy tribunals could award extension of time under exceptional circumstances. There are 1,497 cases pending in IBC. Of these, 535 cases have been in the resolution process for more than 270 days.
“By December, all these 535 cases would have crossed an additional 90 days over 270 days and forced into liquidation,” says Mishra. “Forced liquidation is likely to be stopped by this Supreme Court judgement. There is fresh breather for companies completing 330 days in the December quarter.”
INDIAN STRETCHABLE TIME
The number of companies undergoing insolvency reached 1,497 as on end of September 2019, an alltime high. But timelines for these cases continued to get stretched, with 36% of the on-going cases already having crossed 270 days. An ICRA analysis showed that the average time taken for cases to yield a resolution plan was 374 days.
Until September 30, 2019, 1,045 cases of defaulting corporate debtors had been closed under the IBC. Of the same, 56% (587) were ordered into liquidation, while 15% (156) cases yielded a resolution plan In terms of resolution of the 12 large accounts – the claims are of Rs 3.45 lakh crore and these were ordered into IBC by Mint Road – the resolution plans for seven accounts have been approved and orders for liquidation have been made on two accounts. They had liquidation value of Rs 73,220 crore.
Lanco Infratech and ABG Shipyard are under liquidation, while the resolution process for Amtek Auto, Era Infra and Jaypee Infratech is currently on.
AN END TO LITIGATIONS?
As matters stand, it may be a state of the glass being half full for the apex court, which has now set the broad contours of primacy in badloan resolutions, implying speedier resolutions and a more well-defined waterfall for sale proceeds. But in a country where promoters have been held invincible, a no-nonsense attitude by lenders will go a long way in smashing decades-old practices.
“This will not be end of litigations,” said Abhishek Dafria, analyst, ICRA. “Questions raised by NCLAT have been answered by the Supreme Court and it will help in many cases. Over time, we will see more resolutions, and the way bankruptcy is handled in the country will take a few more years before the process is cemented.”